Monday, January 7, 2013

Restoration, not revolution: Why starting a revolution is a very bad idea

Khrushchev said that the sure destruction of America would happen from within and that they will take down the country without firing a shot.

Stalin himself pointed out that violent revolution often preceded the establishment of a socialist order, which in turn, would become communism.

Given these two notions, one is safe in concluding that any current revolution within America will not involve foreign powers, but will come about by a form of an internal, social breakdown. This, one may reason, is also by design. 

In regards to starting a revolution, my argument (and plea) is for cooler heads to prevail ...

Many people out there are clutching their guns and talking about starting a revolution.  So it is of no surprise to me that the public is being intentionally agitated in order to instigate some sort of armed conflict between the American people and their government.  If the American populace fires the first shot, this will not be a good sign. People forget that we never started a war with the British, it was the British that caused that to happen by attempting to disarm the Colonists.  The king, in every sence, threw the first punch.

We, as a country and individuals, are in a dangerous situation here; fortunately, the Constitution provided for a way to deal with this issue.  However, I have doubts that Americans will properly choose this path.  Even now, hotheaded individuals are calling for revolution in order to keep our private property rights and liberties.  As was pointed out by a police lieutenant from North Carolina, 'liberty broadcasters' (against their knowledge) will be used to fan the flames (in order to start an internal revolution) [Call to Decision, GCN, Jan 2, 2013].  Once the first shots are fired, this in turn will allow for the implementation of martial law.

If you need an example of this issue from a military standpoint, consider that my college and my state fired the first shots of the Civil War.  We did not win that war.  Keep this in mind as you read the rest of this document, please;

Instigators of revolution are all over the place right now, just as the executive office provokes the Republic by openly threatening to ban certain types of firearms. The media is quick to take only one side of the debate, making Americans (purposely) feel like they have no voice.  This is all being done to cause agitation.  The Governor of New York state, too, is threatening confiscation.  Again, Americans are becoming upset at the government and the media for twisting the truth and threatening liberty (as they should be, but not for the reasons that they may think ).

These events are all too convenient ...

Tonight, I got to hear Piers Morgan 'debate' Alex Jones about gun rights in America.  In short, it was a debacle.  Jones screamed that it was going to be '1776 Again!' if any sort of confiscation took place.  Jones, in many respects, is a provocateur at best.  One couldn't be faulted for believing that he played right into Piers Morgan's hands.  However, those of us with a longer memory of Alex Jones's stunts can recall how he nearly caused a state of martial law around the year 2000.

I'm sometimes reminded over the years that Jones almost successfully provoked a nation-wide social catastrophe - on December 31rst, 1999 right before Y2K - by falsely claiming that the Russians would be invading.   Giving this, I personally witnessed folks 'heading for the hills', due to his broadcast.  Had violence or hysteria broken out at that point, I'm certain the powers that be would have suspended the Constitutional Republic and instigated martial law.  Even in those days, I and several others like Mr. Bill Cooper, questioned why Jones would do such a thing.

Jones has never done much for the liberty movement, I know it doesn't seem like it when you look at his body of work, but it is true. By calling for a revolution on national television, he set the stage, again, for catastrophe.

 Restoration, not revolution;

A restoration is a Constitutionally directed process that allows the loyal elements and state militias to restore order during a tyrannical takeover of the Republic.  

Stated, as individuals of this Free Republic, we must avoid the trap of instigating a premature revolution.  Should we defend ourselves against unjust tyranny?  Yes! By all means! But it should only happen under these conditions;

Any sort of violent action against the liberty of the American people has to be started by those that who would wish to abolish the Republic and bring America into the global system (or any other order) - period.  As in poker, a verbal argument or a true fight, whoever throws the first punch loses. It is my belief that the American people are being set up to throw the first punch.

Given this clear understanding, if any tyrannical elements within our own government violently move against the American people, the Republic is allowed to mobilize.  Then - and only at this point - what must take place is a restoration of  Constitutional law and order.  This is the only condition where the people, as a whole and individually, are well within their rights to defend themselves through armed conflict against tyrannical oppression.  If it occurs under any other condition, we may very well witness the fall of the Republic.

Restoration ensures that the rule of law takes precedence over injustice.  Traitors to the Republic should be tried through the American system.  They must be given a fair trial, tried for their crimes against the Republic, and if convicted, be punished for their actions.

Like Waco, these tyrannical elements must throw the first punch. It must be obvious to all of the world who the actual aggressor is.

However, as we are currently poised, a situation is being set up to justify gun confiscation by allowing the armed portion of our Republic to prematurely pick a fight over a possible gun ban [which at this point, hasn't even been introduced to Congress].

You have no idea how utterly well-prepared that these globalist forces are, when it comes to dealing with such a matter. They've been waiting for almost 100 years.  In fact; they want it to happen.

This is a trap that must be avoided.

Bullies can threaten alot of things, whether or not they have the balls to take action is another issue altogether.  

Stated again, don't believe the hype and fall for the trap. Revolutions are violent and their outcomes are uncertain.  What lies at the end may not be the liberty that most of us so vehemently desire.

Prepare, plan and be vigilant - however, make no move that would jeopardize the stability of the Republic.  I'm utterly convinced that many Americans are not prepared to endure a premature revolution given the current economic situation.  Time has to be bought through patience and endurance.

We, as individuals, must make time and hold the voices calling for revolution at bay.

For once America falls, be it by executive order of martial law or through an ill planned armed revolution, it will fall forever.

Thank you for reading.

God bless you and your family, and if Providence wills it again:

God save the Republic.


** This document may be amended for correction and source documentation.**

*Constitutionally And Justly Instructed* 


  1. I have always insisted that it is a restoration that we seek, not a revolution. However, by the time we see the imposition of martial law, or executive order, the deal will have been done.

    We don't need to wait for any more injustices to prove that the government is actively denying our rights and antagonistic toward our liberties.

    I don't think they want to prevent the war against the people, they thirst for it. It is the only way they can get the power they want.

    I will not wait until the troops are in the street and patriots are being bludgeoned outside their homes to make my stand, sorry.

  2. Restoration would be wonderful. What can you see that would start that process?

    At this point I can see nothing and I follow history very closely.

    I could be wrong so if you see something I don't please share it.

    No one is ever prepared for a revolution, the violence, the death. The thought of it is horrible to think about.

    However, the loss of liberty and freedom to me is more horrible. To think of my children and grandchildren growing up in a socialist/communist country is worth whatever sacrifice that needs to be made.

    I fully agree that they should "fire the first shot".

    What is that "shot" to entail? Is it an actual bullet? Or could it be the constant taking of our liberties and freedoms to the point that we reach the end of our rope and say, "no more".

    Restoration is my dream too. That's all most of us want.

    I also, agree that this is a trap. They wish to draw us in. Again, most of us realize that. We definitely are not the uninformed masses they, and maybe even you, think we are. The ones of us that would actually do something to protect our freedoms fully understand the cost. This is certainly not a game to us. It's deadly serious.

    Unfortunately, with the shape of the media today there is very little hope that it will be reported fairly.

    If it's their fault, it will not be reported as such.

    If it's our fault it will be spread across ever page they have access to.

    Either way it's our fault.

    So again I ask. What restoration do we wait for? What can start it in this atmosphere?

    Hope springs eternal but reality is what it is.

    Either way we must be prepared.

  3. In my book RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY, I devote a chapter to considering when armed resistance is justified. I apply the Just War Doctrine to this question. Granted, the Doctrine is intended to evaluate proposed wars against other nations, but it can be used to evaluate the justice of revolt as well. There are conditions that must be met before revolt is justified. Once those conditions are met, revolt is fully justified. Those conditions are: there must be just cause (government is oppressive); comparative justice (rebels must be more just than the government); right intention (set up a more just government, not just put "our gang" in power); it must be a last resort, after all peaceful means have failed; there must be some reasonable chance of success; and proportionality (the damage done by the revolt must not exceed the harm of allowing the oppressive government to stay in power). Once these conditions are met, revolt is justified. Actual shooting by the government may not be necessary to justify revolt. Threats may be sufficient.

    From the standpoint of gathering support for a revolt, the "PR" by the rebels should emphasize these points.

  4. The PR is, of course, the biggest problem as it is with any state run media.

    Nothing will be fairly reported if it is against the established status quo.

    Just cause? Disregard to the Constitution and the rule of law.

    Right intention? Return to the Constitution and the rule of law.

    Last resort? Not seeing many other options that could be successful at this point but this could be debated infinitely.

    Reasonable chance of success? By the numbers, the armed citizens well outweigh military, polices and government by millions.

    Damage done not to exceed harm done?
    Again it could be debated infinitely but the loss of freedom and liberty compared to living in freedom? Is there really any choice there?

    So by the book (no pun intended) it could go either way depending on where your passions are focused at the time.

    Is there justification? In my opinion, yes. Do we want it? In now way, shape, or form. My fear is what other damage will be done the longer it is postponed.

    The other side of the coin is, there could be a chance, no matter how slim that things will change.

    History is against that though. As I've written in other posts, humans are the constant through history. They don't change only the situations do. Human nature is the same and very predictable.

    History says we're on the road to tyranny. All the earmarks are there. Very scary situation we find ourselves in.